Known Facts about Flight simulators

Known Facts about Flight simulators

Introduction

Aircraft simulators or flight simulators try to replicate and reproduce the experience of flying an aircraft. They are now extensively used in the aviation industry for design and development and the training of air crew for both civil and military aircraft.

Aircraft simulators have proven to be an essential element for flight training for individual general aviation pilots and airline flight crew.

I highlight some of the uses of flight simulation, its advantages and disadvantages, and some human factors considerations to do with the issue of flight simulator realism and effectiveness.

Flight simulation involves the representation in a simulator environment of the flight and systems characteristics of an aircraft.

Purpose and form

The primary purpose of flight simulation is to train a pilot to achieve, test, and maintain proficiency in the operation of an airplane without risk to person or property and at a lower cost to training in the air.

In its simplest form, a flight simulator system usually includes:
  • A display, or multiple displays, to represent visually the external environment.
  • Control devices, such as a yoke or control stick and rudder pedals, to provide control inputs to the simulator.
  • A audio system to produce communications, external, aircraft, and cockpit sounds.
  • A computer system or systems to process control inputs, to digitally generate visual and audio representations in response to those inputs, and to record flight data for analysis.

Advantages and disadvantages as a training device

Flight simulators are used as a training device because of their overall effectiveness and efficiency in training pilots.

Some of the advantages of using flight simulators include the following:
  • Permit novice pilots to experience simulated flight without risk to him or her or to valuable aircraft.
  • Availability - that is, flight simulation is not dependent on particular environmental conditions (good weather), or availability of a real aircraft. Correspondingly, it is possible to generate particular conditions without them having to be sought out in the real world.
  • Accessibility – simulation does not require a full flight progression (pre-flight, take-off, flight, landing, post-flight), but permits repeated practice of a particular stage of flight, such as an ILS approach.
  • Cost-effectiveness – savings in crew time, fuel, maintenance to real aircraft, revenue that would be lost using a real aircraft, and environmental impact.
  • Risk-free introduction of flight challenges, such as conflicting traffic, systems problems, difficult or unusual flight maneuvers, poor weather conditions, wind shear, and wake turbulence.
  • Risk-free introduction of emergencies and systems failures.
  • When used during air crash investigations - ability to accurately replicate the environmental and flight conditions at the time of an accident to test pilot responses to those conditions.
  • Instructional features – recorded flight data, ability to “replay” and review a simulated flight or parts of it, allow matching of performance against criteria.
  • Relieves instructor from flight duties and safety considerations.
  • Permits trainee to make and learn from mistakes without risk.

Some of the disadvantages include the following:
  • Effect of the simulator environment on the operator. In a simulated accident situation, for example, we would not expect the simulator operator to experience the same stress levels as would be expected in anticipation of a real accident.
  • Simulator users, particularly where used as part of a currency test, may be expected to have studied and therefore anticipate certain procedures, conditions, or emergencies during the course of their simulated flight.
  • Shorter flight cycles do not accurately reflect pilot fatigue or boredom.
  • In addition to the cost to build a simulator, they have ongoing operation and maintenance costs.

Realism and effectiveness

No flight simulator system is entirely “realistic”. Flight simulator systems vary in complexity and realism, with more complex and realistic systems producing a correspondingly more realistic experience for the operator of the simulator. For example, the more advanced simulators used by commercial air transport operators usually include a motion base that responds to control inputs and digitally generated environmental factors (such as weather) to mimic the expected movements of an aircraft. This results in more realistic motion cues being felt by the operator of the simulator.

There is controversy over whether achieving realism or achieving training objectives is most important in the development of simulators.

According to Hays and Singer, the effectiveness of a simulator depends on how its features support the total training system, and the realism of a simulator should vary according to stage of learning, type of task, and type of task analysis.

GOLDEN WORDS TO BE FOLLOWED : :

Top Aviation instructors / experts say .,
Approach the flight simulator as you will do in the real aircraft . This will enhance your flying and learning curve to un imaginable levels.
Approaching flight simulator with negative mental attitude will downgrade the value of your training . This is true even with multi million dollar simulators.

Article Written by Er.R. Ramesh Babu B.E.,AIE (M-AOPA)
Ex-Ground Engineer Air Side  Airports Authority Of India

Simfocal has an extensive range of flight simulator products, visit here for more http://www.simfocal.com/flight-simulator